The Corporation and the School: Prestige on the Surface and something else Beneath
- John Swoboda

- Dec 10, 2023
- 4 min read
Updated: Dec 21, 2025
If you want to understand the Anglican Church Southern Queensland (ACSQ), also known as the Anglican Diocese of Brisbane, also known as the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane, you have to start with one simple truth. It is a church, yes. It is also a corporation that happens to speak fluent theology.
In its own polished reports, the ACSQ presents as a mission driven organisation dedicated to faith, compassion and community service. And to be fair, it does run schools, aged care, homelessness programs, parish life, chaplaincy and more committees than any human could survive without caffeine. It also happens to control more than half a billion dollars in assets.
According to the financial statements filed with the charity regulator, the ACSQ held 527 million dollars in total assets as of April 2022. Of this, 372 million dollars sits in investment properties. Property is the real cathedral in modern Anglican Queensland. The pews might be quiet, but the portfolio sings.
What you will not find, at least not in any clear table of figures, is the total amount the organisation has paid to survivors of child sexual abuse. That piece of the story tends to remain tucked away behind reimbursement accounting and careful wording. One day, perhaps, a bishop will explain why transparency is always described as a virtue but never offered as a habit.
The ACSQ is governed by the Corporation of the Synod, which sounds ecclesiastical but functions like any other board that has discovered the power of committees. Decisions flow through commissions that manage schools, finances, ministry formation, parishes and community services. Each commission is described as collaborative and strategic. Anyone who has ever dealt with a large religious organisation knows that this is code for slow moving and politically delicate.
Into this corporate labyrinth sits one of its most prized institutions. The Southport School (TSS).
A School Built on Prestige and Told History
When I think back to TSS, I see manicured lawns, sandstone arches and the kind of prestige that glows in the glossy brochures. I also see a place where many boys grew, excelled, suffered, hid, endured and tried their best to navigate a culture that often demanded silence where courage was needed most.
From 1992 to 1996 I walked those grounds as a student. I remember the fields, the Queensland sun, the noise of boarding houses, and the sense that this was a place where success was expected before it was understood. Palmam Qui Meruit Ferat.
Let him who deserves the palm of victory bear it.
The motto was painted on walls, stitched on blazers and etched into our sense of who we were meant to become.
The school is more than a campus. It is a legacy that families send their sons into with pride. It is also an institution governed by the same ACSQ entity that, in public, champions integrity and healing while, behind the scenes, employing legal teams and public relations strategies designed to limit rather than illuminate.
Founded in 1901, TSS is a major player in the Great Public Schools Association. These are the elite boys schools of Queensland, known for excellence in academics, sport and producing young men with confidence, privilege and a very particular understanding of authority. The list reads like a roll call of tradition. Brisbane Boys College. Churchie. Terrace. Brisbane Grammar. Ipswich Grammar. Toowoomba Grammar. Marist College Ashgrove. And of course, TSS.
This network is famous for competition. What it is less known for is the long and complicated record of abuse, silence and institutional protection brought to light through the Royal Commission. These schools were built on excellence, but they were also built on cultures that prized reputation over transparency.
Two Stories, One Institution
To speak about TSS separately from its governing corporation is to miss the real picture. The ACSQ speaks the language of mission. The school speaks the language of history and pride. Both operate within the same system that has, for decades, struggled to confront its own failures with honesty.
When viewed together, the pattern becomes clearer.
The ACSQ is an institution with enormous financial power, polished public messaging and a long standing difficulty with accountability.TSS is an institution with tradition, prestige and a carefully curated identity that sometimes obscured what happened behind closed doors.
One presents as compassionate. The other presents as excellent. Both, at times, failed to protect children in their care.
For those of us who lived it, the story is neither simple nor tidy. I remember the beauty of the campus and the joy of friendships. I also remember the harm that shaped my life, long before I had the language to describe it. The school shaped me, but so did the corporation behind it. The official narratives never quite matched the truth lived by the students who endured the darker chapters.
This is what makes silence such a dangerous thing. Institutions survive on the stories they tell about themselves. Survivors survive on the stories they have finally learned to speak aloud.
Why This Chapter Matters
The ACSQ continues to operate as a major corporate and spiritual force in Queensland. It controls schools, funds ministries, manages extensive property, and presents itself as committed to healing and transparency. It carries the language of reconciliation while still learning how to practise it.
TSS continues to educate boys and celebrate its traditions. It also carries a history that cannot be separated from the present.
To understand either the corporation or the school, you have to hold both truths at the same time. The beauty and the harm. The mission and the reality. The aspiration and the failure. The palm of victory and the cost borne by those who were denied safety within its walls.
This chapter is not about condemnation. It is about clarity. Institutions cannot change if they remain safely wrapped in their own stories. They must be seen fully, including the parts they would rather keep quiet.
And for those of us who lived inside those walls, the truth is not just history. It is biography.




Comments